
When Roger Federer won the French Open this morning, one thing the commentating team kept mentioning was the fact that everyone was rooting for him. Count me as one of them.
I confess that I cheat when it comes to watching tennis. If there is a tennis match on, chances are I'm not watching it. However, when it comes to the majors (Australian Open, Wimbledon, French Open and U.S. Open), I'm totally on board.
And I've always found myself pulling for Federer. Maybe it is the quiet confidence he displays. Everyone recognized he was, for a time, the most dominant force in the sport, but I can't remember a time when he showed up an opponent with a flashy celebration or trash talk. I'm not an crotchety old-timer who thinks there shouldn't be any celebration, but I respect the way Federer handles his business.
Secondly, more than any other time, I was rooting for Federer because he had never won in France. I would like to think Federer is the greatest of all time, but my severe lack of tennis knowledge really means this is a uninformed opinion. However, that being said, many with a more informed opinion also believe that Federer may be the greatest of all time, and if he were to really hold that title, he had to win all four Grand Slams. With the emergence of Rafa Nadal, it appeared that Federer was not going to be able to complete the career grand slam. While still able to cruise to Grand Slam semifinals, Federer couldn't no longer beat Nadal on any surface. To make a poor sports comparison, it was as if Federer had become the old, wrinkled Rocky, caught up to by a younger generation who had used him the standard for greatness. Federer had reached a career peak at 27.
Additionally, as a sports enthusiast, I love seeing history being made. I'm lucky enough to have seen Detroit sports teams win 4 Stanley Cups and 3 NBA titles during my lifetime, and Tiger Woods set new modern records on the golf course, and to me, it is exciting to see record books being rewritten. Federer, and Nadal, can do that everytime they enter a tournament, so it seems as if I am always rooting for them.
Like Pete Sampras late in his career, I feel like Federer on his worst day is better than all but a handful of his competitors, however, the gap is always shrinking, and some cases, like Nadal, Federer has been passed. It is not a knock on Federer, it just means that he has been on the top for so long, he has forced players to improve to be able to compete with him. I see Federer having a two-year window of being able to win a major. At the end of that time, he'll be 29, which is a dinosaur in tennis years. And with Nadal only being 23 and entering the prime of his career, I don't see Federer winning more than two majors in the next two years. However, I would be pleasantly surprised if he does.
So congratulations Roger, the hard work you have put in to tennis finally gave you that elusive French Open crown. I hope you have just as much success in the future, but for now, enjoy the victory.
